Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-06 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: jdrukman%dlsun87@us.oracle.com (Jon Drukman)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 09:57:16 PST
Subject: Re: You're the one - NOT?
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
References: <940217201439_100276.2176_BHB110-2@CompuServe.COM>
Marcel Rijs writes: >Anyway, up to this Jon is absolutely right. He explains why _he_ >likes GOOMH so much and YTO not. And true, it is easier to achieve >more impact with something new. This implies however, that something >'old' can have an impact too. yup, absolutely. >But then Jon starts to be a little "high & mighty": who, ME? >> It may well be the case that you are a youngster and not jaded >> from hearing 18 billion bluesy guitar 'n' organ tracks throughout >> the course of your young life. I, while hopefully not exactly >> "old," have, however, heard enough of that particular genre to >> know that I basically have no interest in it and will continue to >> have little interest in it, regardless of the talent of the >> artist who decides to tackle it. > >I may be young, but not a youngster. In my quarter of a century I >may have heard more music than you will in your entire life! i rather doubt that, but it's irrelevant... >the "I've got some monet with me" part, I found it extremely funny >because of its cliche. (I have still not figured out which song >exactly it reminded me of. Must be a blues song... ;) ) But she >adapts the style rather uniquely, I must say. well, i don't think so. it's a typical bluesy ballad. where's the innovation? just the fact that kate's doing it doesn't make it automatically innovative. >In an age where 'blending' of music styles is rather trendy, Kate >blends with the best of them. where's the blending? like i said, it sounds typical and unimaginative. >And this song is not "just a cliche", because if you want to hear >cliche, you should turn to "talented" artists like Two Unlimited, >Modern Talking or the Rolling Stones. i don't understand this "argument"... it's not a cliche because kate generally makes innovative music? what kind of logic is that? >I think too many people here want to see Kate making The Dreaming >over and over again. Face it: _she won't_. And it's not a damn >shame, it's good that she doesn't. 'cos _that_ would be cliche. i have no problem with that. i don't care if she doesn't remake The Dreaming. but why did she have to remake Traffic??? >> If Kate did a thrash metal album, would you like it? > >I certainly would! Let's team her up with Sepultura or >Mortification and see what she comes up with! :-) :-) er, well, pick a genre that you don't like then. my point is that she chose to work in a rather well-worn genre and it's only the fact that the readers of the list have a tolerance for that certain style that leads to the praise... i think it would be interesting if kate did something in a style that most people here can't tolerate... gangsta rap, perhaps. all of a sudden there'd a be a mad rush to venerate Dr Dre... -- Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.