Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-30 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: giamomj@duvm.ocs.drexel.edu (Mike G.)
Date: 25 Aug 93 15:50:28 GMT
Subject: Re: Kate Bush vs. Tori Amos???
To: rec-music-gaffa@rutgers.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Drexel University
References: <1993Aug24.155841.15852@netnews.noc.drexel.edu>
Sender: news@noc.ocs.drexel.edu
Re: Kate Bush vs. Tori Amos???
In article <NESSUS.93Aug24141733@twitch.media.mit.edu> Douglas Alan,
nessus@media.mit.edu writes:
>Actually, calling something "arty" is usually considered an insult.
>Therefore if Kate's work is "artier" than Tori's, it would be a point
>in favor of Tori. Of course, Kate's work is artier. It also happens
>to be better, despite this.
I find your above statment confusing and somewhat contradictory....please
explain. And how is "arty" an insult?
*"There are lawyers who lie brilliantly, and dope
addicts who never learned how to lie" *
- Jim Garrison, 1967