Re: Rubberband Music Is Love?

[chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams)]

In article <24AUG199313522683@utkvx.utk.edu> you write:
>In article <m0oTyLS-000illC@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu>, chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams) writes...
>> 
>>   I'll repeat the offer to create 16-bit versions. The 8-bits I made
>>were at *11-khz* and the Sun format is *8-khz* so there may be some loss
>>there. 
>	I usually just lurk around here and post very occasionally (maybe once
>or twice a year).  I would enjoy hearing better quality versions of these
>songs, but if the original source is a tape (I assume it is a casette tape), I
>do not think that the dynamic range is wide enough to worry about 16-bit
>sampling.  If they could be resampled at 22 or 44 kHz so that the freqency
>response was wider, I would be very interested in hearing them.

   3rd generation cassette, so yeah, the original quality is not
tremendously high to begin with. My board, a SoundBlaster 16, can
record at 11, 22 and 44 khz in 8 or 16 bit modes, mono and stereo.

   I'll play around with them, and see what I can come up with.


                          Chris Williams of
                             Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago
                               chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (his)
                                 vickie@njin.rutgers.edu      (hers)
                                   katefans@chinet.chinet.com (ours)