Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-35 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 92 17:18:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Sound quality / Peter Gabriel's "Us"
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
References: <1992Dec6.063412.18189@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <fester.723754426@parnasus> <1992Dec8.024328.25715@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Dec8.235603.5117@cltr.uq.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
In <1992Dec8.235603.5117@cltr.uq.OZ.AU> mattd@cltr.uq.oz.au (Matthew Deshon) writes: >as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik) writes: >>I didn't print the entire article, but Mr. Ludwig's post mentioned that >>Peter Gabriel was "a d*mn good singer"... >>We won't mention technical aspects, but aesthetically he doesn't have the >>most beautiful of voices, does he? I love his stuff, as I love Robyn >>Hitchcock's, but oft have I wished they had more dulcet pipes. Peter's >>songs are gorgeous, and as correctly as he sings, I wish someone with a more >>pleasant timbre were singing them. >I reckon PG's voice suits the music he sings perfectly. Do you not listen >to Lou Reed, Billy Bragg, Tom Waits, etc, simply because they don't have >perfect voices? These people know how to write music which their own >voice will enhance. >I totally agree that his songs are gorgeous! >matt >-- >Matt Deshon >Applications Programmer, "And all my instincts they return, >Centre for Language Teaching and Research The grand facade so soon will burn >University of Queensland Without a noise, without my pride >email : mattd@cltr.uq.oz.au I reach out from the inside." >Phone : +61 7 365 6915 - Peter Gabriel Oh, I listen to a lot of people with inferior voices. Robyn Hitchcock, Robert Smith of the Cure, Mike Edwards of Jesus Jones, Peter Murphy ex of Bauhaus, and the Johns of They Might Be Giants. Let me clarify inferior: what I mean is less-than-classically-beautiful. Hitchcock can be nasal and often lacks sufficient breath support, Smith is generally wavery, Edwards is painfully hoarse and often has to strain for higher notes, Murphy chews his vowels as if they were Double Bubble, and the Johns are appropriately nasal. This rarely diminishes my enjoyment of their music, as it is highly appropriate to the style/feel of their music, and well, hell, not everyone's a trained vocalist, and you don't have to have a terrific voice to sound pleasant. *However...* I think Gabriel's voice, while it goes very well with his music, still belongs to the above class of less-than-classically-beautiful voices. I would love to hear a less hoarse voice on some of these lovely songs. LET ME BE CLEAR ABOUT THIS! I love PG's voice, I love his music, and I love all of the above artists dearly. But I can still be a music-snob and express my feelings about their voices. Objectively I don't like their voices; subjectively I love their voices. We are essentially in agreement, you and I; I simply failed to make myself clear. By the way, I love Lou Reed's music; Billy Bragg's I can take or leave depending on the individual song; Tom Waits fascinates me but his voice is so otherworldly that I can't bear to listen to it. It honestly terrifies me. (Oh, and I hate Shane McGowan's voice (the Pogues), and I hate his music, too, so there's an instance where objectively and subjectively I agree.) Drewcifer -- *************************************************************************** ** Andrew David Simchik, registered Scorpio ************* SCHNOPIA! ******* *************************************************************************** as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu