Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-31 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: News admin <news@sco.COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 92 10:56:05 PST
To: rec-music-gaffa@sco.COM
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Path: jondr From: jondr@sco.COM (Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic) Subject: Re: Happy Rhodes -- First Impressions Reply-To: jondr@sco.com Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 18:54:49 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov03.185449.1395@sco.com> References: <9210301922.AA10868@cadence.Cadence.COM> <Nov.1.00.33.15.1992.17683@pilot.njin.net> Sender: news@sco.com (News admin) Lines: 62 I am not vickie@pilot.njin.net (Vickie Mapes). I didn't say: >> Besides her voice, one other feature struck me as >>especially Kate-like: rich, meaty strings. Are these sampled? > >They're not sampled. Everything came out of her synths. She had >just bought a synth of her own right before recording the songs >on Rearmament. My mind's a blank right now as to what kind of >synth she bought. Before that she used the one at the studio >where she worked as an appretence engineer and recorded all her >music. Sounds like a Juno 106 to me. >>Is she using a Fairlight? > >:-) :-) :-) No, she doesn't have a Fairlight. She doesn't even >have a record contract. Fairlight is no longer the big deal it used to be. You can get a sampler of comparable quality for under $2000. >> It is really extraordinary >>how much of a difference these sounds make when compared >>to the (IMHO) cheesy string sounds that most synthesizers >>(and many samplers) put out. > >I agree. It's not the equipment though, it's the talent of >the artist using the equipment. total bullcrud. you can play the stock string sounds on any old roland hybrid digital/analog beastie and it will sound utterly gorgeous. whether you play the chord progression from "running up that hill" or "like a virgin" will not affect how beautiful the strings are. you'll have to pardon me here but i get very emotional thinking about roland strings. they're so damn sexy. oooooooooohhhhhh.... >A tech question? O.K.......In our home studio, we use a Korg M1, Korg T3, > Korg DW-8000, (no, Korg isn't paying us), they should. those machines (with the possible exception of the DW8000) are EVIL. > Juno 106,(analog lives still),a Roland right on. i told ya it was a juno 106, and i didn't peek either. i used one of those all through high school. i would even consider getting one for our studio. sub oscillators rule. >We have an Amiga computer and the sequencer we use is Dr. T's KCS V3.5. ah, that explains everything. i think happy should have me and the twitch crew do a techno/rave remix. (although it'll probably turn out more tribal/progressive house given that that's what i'm listening to now...) send me the a capella vocal track and a finished mix so i can have a reference point and watch out. -- Jon Drukman (God's personal DJ) uunet!sco!jondr jondr@sco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.