Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-05 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: stev0@sti.com (Steve Berlin)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1992 08:22:27 -0800
Subject: Re: Taking the Pseudo- out of Pseudo-Moderator?
To: <love-hounds@WIRETAP.SPIES.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Software Transformation, Inc.
References: <20320.696815959@ims.alaska.edu>
Sender: news@sti.com
In article <20320.696815959@ims.alaska.edu>, wisner@ims.alaska.EDU (The World Famous Bill Wisner) writes: |> Do readers really want Love-Hounds to become truly moderated, and have |> extraneous articles (for some definition of extraneous) filtered out? |> |> I could do this. But there are catches. |> |> The first catch, the obvious one, is that rec.music.gaffa would no longer |> be an immediate forum. Articles would not show up and be available for |> reading until the moderator got around to posting it. Some would say this |> is a good thing. |> Geez, there is already too-long a lag between postings. We don't need a reason for yet another delay. |> The second catch is that the delay between posting an article and seeing it |> show up would probably be directly related to how busy I was that day. Sad |> to say, Love-Hounds is not at the top of my personal priority totem pole. |> Love-Hounds not the most important thing in your life? BLASPHEMPY! You must be BURNED AT THE STAKE with those other CRETINS who thing KATE BUSH is a MERE MORTAL! (Note for the humor-oblivious (not to mention any names, such as Jorn) - that was sarsasm) |> The third catch is that my definition of what articles are suitable for |> inclusion would probably be entirely arbitrary. |> |> So, do I turn Love-Hounds into a truly moderated mailing list/newsgroup? Or |> does discussion (such as it is) continue unhindered? You decide. |> I am against all forms of censorship. There are too many great writers lesser minds have tried to keep quiet (for some odd reason, I feel like using James Joyce as an example). Not that I'm calling myself a "great writer" (If I could, I would be the next Karen Finley), I'm not talking about ME at all - I'm talking about ALL censorship. If someone proposed to kick Jorn off this newsgroup, I would tell them to fuck off. (The proposer). WORKING EXAMPLES: I personally don't like reading pre-HOL interviews with Kate. People change, and if she were asked the same questions today, she would probably give different answers on half the non-technical questions. However, this is, above all, a KATE BUSH FORUM, and many people like reading these interviews. So keep 'em coming, I say! |> Bill Wisner <wisner@ims.alaska.edu> Gryphon Gang Fairbanks AK 99775 |> I want to be a scholar, but I really can't be bothered -Stev0 the card-carrying member of the ACLU "But it couldn't be you, couldn't be you, it was a picture of Jorn" - Heads We're Dancing P.S. If I WAS temporarily kick off this newgroup, could I consider myself to be suspended from Gaffa? -- Steve Berlin (Stev0) | "Up yours, Ugly!" Stev0@sti.com | -Kate Bush