No Subject

[news@cpoint.clearpoint.com]

To: crackers!eddie.mit.edu!rec-music-gaffa
Path: cpoint!crackers!m2c!hsdndev!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!ora!bloom-beacon!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines
From: scottt@spider.co.UK (Scott Telford)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: ADELAIDE KATEMAS/ KATE BOOKS
Message-ID: <1991Jul26.094600.25192@spider.co.uk>
Date: 26 Jul 91 09:46:00 GMT
References: <9107251535.AA28143@spam.ua.oz.au>
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Lines: 45


yes I think). It
covers the making of the Experiment IV video in some detail (lots of
colur pics of KaTe in the Sound Demon costume, for some reason).
There's a file in the L-H archive (called 'visual-doc-errors' or
something) written by IED listing all the thing the authors got wrong. 

>               There also was a newer book on KaTe
>         with a green front cover with Kate's face with flowers
>         in her hair on it.
>         I cannot recall the full title but it had the word
>         SECRET in it in parenthesis. This book
>         was smaller and 10 dollars cheaper.
>

That'll be "The Secret History of Kate Bush". I haven't read it but I
think it mostly digs up some dirt about KaTe's ancestry (and some about
East Wickham Farm too?). It's written by IED's favorite anti-hero and
according to IED is apparently full of cr*p.
-- 
Scott Telford                        "I think she's one of the greatest
Spider Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.    composers of the century, in my opinion."
email: scottt@spider.co.uk                       
phone: +44 31 554 9424                           - Nigel Kennedy, on Kate Bush.
#! rnews 1272
Path: crackers!m2c!bu.edu!stanford.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!world!eff!eff-gate!usenet
From: 0003158580@mcimail.COM (William Hugh Murray)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <25910727032252.0003158580NA2EM@mcimail.com>
Date: 27 Jul 91 03:22:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@eff.org
Organization: EFF mail-news gateway
Lines: 18
Approved: usenet@eff.org

>"All these shootings"?  What does gun control have to do with crime?
>Certainly none of the current bills (with the possible exception of
>the Stagger's bill defeated in the House) have anything to do with
>crime.  They are merely regulation for regulation's sake.

Exactly, Mr. Greely.  If you will not hear my words, then re-read your
own -- over and over -- until you get the message.  When people are
frightened they turn to government.  That government is not effective
has little to do with it.  That the laws proposed limit freedom without
dealing with the problem does not make any difference.  I may not be able
to limit your