Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1997-31 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What's best for Kate

From: Don <fastslow@idt.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 20:41:35 -0700
Subject: Re: What's best for Kate
To: nywriter@aol.com (NY WRITER)
Cc: fastslow@idt.net, L-H Mailing List <love-hounds@gryphon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <19971020182301.OAA27794@ladder02.news.aol.com>
References: <l03110701b0701eaaaec4@[169.132.209.159]>

At 11:23 AM -0700 10-20-97, NY WRITER wrote:
><What makes you think an artist is the best judge of all this. If that were
> true, no artist would blow his mind out on drugs (think Syd Barrett) or kill
> himself (Kurt Cobain). Speaking of KB acting in her own self-interest, how
> good is smoking for Kate's well-being?>
>
>There are always people, artists included, who  fall through the cracks. Who
> would be best responsible for that artists' artistic path, the fan? I'm
> presuming that you're more intellgent than that.

Of course I am. However, I still feel that her work habit (or lack thereof)
are a reasonable topic of discussion and a "Kate Knows Best" attitude
contributes little to the discourse.

- Don