Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1997-26 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Richard Bensam <rabensam@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 15:45:41 -0500
Subject: Re: MisK
To: Love-Hounds <love-hounds@gryphon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <m0x8r7k-000k0bC@miso.wwa.com>
References: <199709100828.BAA22453@churchill.gryphon.com>
Chris Williams writes: >>No, there is something going on with the moderator. > > ...who should be thanked for all the work put into maintaining >Love-Hounds/rec.music.gaffa. Agreed. Bill, you're the greatest! >>Also: someone recently suggested divorcing Love-Hounds from >>rec.music.gaffa. I am willing to consider this. Comments? > > No, no and no! *Please* don't cut the connection. New fans >can discover Love-Hounds via rec.music.gaffa. Given Kate's productivity, >we *need* a constant influx of new blood. Agreed. BTW, that comment about "Kate's productivity" is a masterpiece of litotes. > rec.music.gaffa divorced from Love-Hounds would soon become >just another spam-filled Usenet music group with no posts from >anyone except befuddled newbies. Agreed. I've been in other newsgroup / mailing list pairs which diverged this way, and this is exactly what has happened. In fact, I tried very hard to persuade the keepers of one such mailing list to emulate the rmg/LH symbiosis precisely to avoid this. Sadly, I failed, and the newsgroup half is dying a not-so-slow death. > Love-Hounds divorced from rec.music.gaffa would soon >become just another insipid chatty mailing list of "insiders". Agreed. Love-Hounds is always in danger of this happening anyway -- no criticism of the gang intended here; it's just the nature of the beast when any group of particularly knowledgeable fans of something gets together. > The combination of a mailing list gatewayed to a moderated Usenet >group is powerful, and (IMO) is the way of the future. Bi-directional >gateways may be the only thing that can *save* Usenet. L-H/r.m.g >is a *wonderful* example of how well it can work (the last few digests >only prove how well the barbarians have been kept out, people!) Agreed. But still, from various posts it seems that the service on the r.m.g. side has left something to be desired lately. Bill, is there anything that can be done to make r.m.g. more reliable? Or is it something to do with various ISPs and entirely out of your hands? Frankly, I'd like to switch over -- unsubscribe from the mailing list and resubscribe to the newsgroup -- but I was missing too many posts thanks to an unreliable Usenet feed. > To paraphrase Frank Zappa: The suggestion to separate Love-Hounds >from rec.music.gaffa is, in this context, the equivilant of treating >dandruff by decapitation. Agreed. Could've saved myself a lot of typing if I'd just said "I agree with everything Chris said." RAB _______________________________________ Richard Bensam Home Page http://home.earthlink.net/~rabensam/ Gaffaweb: A Tribute To Kate Bush And Her Fans http://www.gryphon.com/gaffa/