Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1997-22 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Ronald W. Garrison" <rwgarr@intrex.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 16:59:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Paya Paya Paya
To: rec-music-gaffa@moderators.uu.net
To: cbullard@hiwaay.net
Approved: wisner@gryphon.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
References: <33DD685B.4792@hiwaay.net>
Reply-To: rwgarr@intrex.net
len bullard wrote: > Renee writes: > > Don't do it for the > money. Don't do it for free. Get something you want. Look > at it like this; a lot of people move here from India to work > because America is wealthy and India is not. Yet, > here I am listening to bhajans, ragas, and ghazals. Why? > I have 12 notes and they have 22. Rich is what one doesn't have. > Were the Sadhus the poorest or the wealthiest of men, Renee? > AND (from len?)... > Still, I have to agree with you Ron, that when > I've been to the Mosh Pit scene, I have to wonder just what is > eating these folks. Whatever t'is, it is a weird contrast. The > "sixties" (1962 to 1972), were a period of incredible creativity > in music, and yet, a period of awful death and inhumanity at > least, from the perspective of growing up on this side of the pond. > Now, we have period of peace, mindbending prosperity, and some of > the most depressed music I've ever heard. Maybe it's the heroin, > maybe it's the tube, maybe it's the boredom. Frankly, since a > lot of X'ers *(whatever ... didn't care for freak or hippie much > myself), > are here, it would be good to hear what you think. > > > len ========== OK, While we're onto culture, the blues, teen angst, etc. etc., consider this little philosphical conundrum: Many have commented that it almost seems to take great sufffering to make great art. The blues is the fount of so much creativity, for instance; and after all, when did you ever hear of a really cookin' rock band from, say, Switzerland? No way! On the other hand, not everybody who does great stuff is all messed up. Is Kate the exception that proves the rule, or do we need to revise the rule? Other than having her mother die (at least, thankfully, not when Kate was very young--and after all, this is not an unusual sorrow, we have to say), I don't know what has ever happened to Kate that is really very bad at all. Her life almost seems the picture of tranquility, by all accounts. And yet she somehow did not turn out as some spoiled rich kid. Maybe money doesn't explain everything after all.) -- Ron http://www.intrex.net/rwgarr/