Re: Kate's Looks

["barnster" <barnster@hell.com>]

Since so many of you responded to my message, it is obvious that her looks
are important to many of you.  If her looks really didn't matter, many of
you would not have gotten so excited by my message that you had to post.  I
still maintain that her good looks helped her to become a huge success, and
she is also amazingly talented.  

I'm looking forward to her new album.  "The Man I Love" and the Common
Ground stuff was sufficient, but I was disappointed when I compare them to
songs from TSW.  Also, her b-sides are not as good as they used to be
though even a weak KT b-side is more entertaining than most recording
artists a-side.  I felt that "Under The Ivy" was her last great b-side. 
Hopefully sometime in 97, we will get to rip open the shrink wrap of a new
KT album so we can enjoy another great moment in life.   

love,
barnster

Lt Comm Zee <lt.comm.zee@tip.nl> wrote in article
<01bbec50$194f8040$192fb18f@t016631>...
> Of course I would I didn't even know what she looked like
> when I first heard her music.
> lt.comm.zee@tip.nl
> 
> barnster <barnster@hell.com> wrote in article
> <01bbe744$50b12680$08aaaace@buzzard>...
> > About a half year ago, I questioned if Kate was not a beautiful woman,
> > would all of you still listen to her music.  Seems as if the thread has
> > returned in recent weeks.  I'm sure that her good looks helps,
especially
> > if one is to be an entertainer.  Whether you are attracted to men or
> women,
> > a pretty face is more appealing than a plain one.  I'm looking forward
to
> > decades from now when she is crinkled as if an old apple, stumbling
> around
> > with a cane, hawking up phlegm after every sentence, to see if any of
us
> > would still buy her records.  I sure hope we would!  
> > 
> > barnster
> > 
>