Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1996-48 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Kate's Looks

From: Mukamuk <Mukamuk@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 14:12:15 -0800
Subject: Re: Kate's Looks
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Snickering Lemming, Inc. (a subsidiary of Rancid Ocelot Enterprises)
References: <199612101001.LAA15611@angel.algonet.se> <01bbf16f$8719cee0$18abaace@buzzard>
Sender: owner-love-hounds

barnster wrote:
> 
> Since so many of you responded to my message, it is obvious that her looks
> are important to many of you.  If her looks really didn't matter, many of
> you would not have gotten so excited by my message that you had to post.

Ah, I see.  So if she drowns, she's innocent, but if she floats, she's a witch and we 
must kill her.

Or more succinctly, if I follow your logic correctly: "He who smelt it dealt it."

Guess you win either way, Barnster  ;)

--Mukamuk