Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-36 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: mrees@pppmail.nyser.net (Michael Rees)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 96 08:14:40
Subject: Re: Well, she is rescued
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
In-Reply-To: <960826175014_394523549@emout12.mail.aol.com> (from IEDSRI@aol.com) (at Mon, 26 Aug 1996 17:50:14 -0400)
Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
Reply-To: mrees@pppmail.nyser.net (Michael Rees)
Sender: owner-love-hounds
Hi there, IED. On Aug 26, you wrote: => ... What is significant about Kate's remark is that it is -- => like the end of TNW itself -- vague, and therefore capable of sustaining => multiple interpretations. ... And what is significant about TNW is that the interpretations remain coherent no matter what vector one takes throughout the piece. And that is what makes it art, and not just an album side. If there were only one possible path through the work, then where would the magic be? My 2p... m.