Re: Katename, etc.

[jda94@puma.inf.ufpr.br (Jose David Araujo - 941750-8)]

> From love-hounds-request@uunet.uu.net Tue Oct 17 13:07 SAT 1995
> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 12:01:08 -0400
> From: "Stuart M. Castergine" <scasterg@cd.columbus.oh.us>
> Subject: Re: Katename, etc.
> To: Love-Hounds <love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> 
> On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Steve ZPJ wrote:
> 
> > And, knowing Kate, she would never come onto this newsgroup and just 
> > say 'hello'. She would enter the discussions under a pseudonym and 
> > not give her identity away, at least, not for a while.
> 
> I'd disagree. My own wild speculation is that posting under a pseudomyn
> would be the kind of sneakiness and dishonesty that I think she doesn't
> approve of. I think she would certainly lurk, never posting at all. But I
> think that if she ever did post, she would not mislead people about who
> she was. Note that I said "wild speculation." I have no facts with which
> to back up my statement. In fact, against that theory is the fact that 
> she has apparently written under pseudonyms for the KBC newsletter.
> 
HEY, are you talking about the girl that wrote BABOOSHKA? Hmm, I guess no.
She is a million persons, and is one.