Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-23 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan <dmckiern@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 16:48:37 -0700
Subject: Re: Resend : 9thwave.pdf (uses another decodingtype) - 9thwave.uue [01/15]
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <9507172122.AA19718@greylady.uoregon.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
On Mon, 17 Jul 1995, Steve VanDevender wrote: > Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan <dmckiern@weber.ucsd.edu> ignorantly spouts: > >> Dennis Bergstrom wrote: >> >>> [in total 15 messages of binary junk *again*] > > It's not junk. It's manchapuriata, but I've been able to figure out > most or all of how to convert it back into the .pdf. (Got to dash > and do some other stuff before I learn whether the job is done.) > >> Look, mate. Will you stop posting binaries in here? Upload to an >> FTP site, by all means, or post them to a binaries group. But refrain >> from effectively mail-bombing the group. Have a little consideration >> for those that pay for their own news feed. > > This is really unkind. Bergstrom is trying to make available > something that most of us would like to have, and the attempt has > clearly involved significant effort on his part. If you =had= to > slam him, couldn't you have done that with direct email? > > _I_ didn't want 1.4 megabytes of uuencoded and BASE64 data for a > document I can't use coming into _my_ personal mailbox. Right. Now, tell me where I said that it was =appropriate= for him to post the uuencodings. Can't? That's because I didn't. > Apparently you are ignorant of the nature of > rec.music.gaffa/Love-Hounds. Nope. I know what it is, and I know English, and I know logic. You've fallen down somewhere with respect to the last two, and have made an absurd inferential leap in your interpretation of my remarks. > rec.music.gaffa is not just a > mailing list, it's a mail-news gateway. So when this moron > posted and REPOSTED that gigantic file, it meant that every > mailing list subscriber got either a 1.4M digest or 1.4M of loose > mail as a result. He neither was nor is a moron. You aren't a moron either, but you certainly have a problem. > This is unacceptable. The people who didn't > want that gigantic piece of junk shouldn't be forced to swallow > it because thre are a few people who did, No one said that they should. Try again, or shut up. > and anyone who is > ignorant enough to post binaries to a mail-news gateway deserves > to be flamed into unconsciousness. Bull____. Everyone starts out ignorant. He made a mistake in the course of having invested a significant effort trying to be helpful. The appropriate response was quick, firm, polite email -- not flames to rec.music.gaffa. It's always Dark. Light only hides the Darkness. Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (619) 535 - 0546 athanatos@UCSD.edu 132.239.147.2 <75013,676>