Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-55 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: sgs5332@cs.rit.edu (Stephen G Siener)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1993 15:48:39 -0500
Subject: Re: "Lily" and religious references
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
References: <m0pCirs-000iliC@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu><m0pDKXG-000ilqC@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu><NESSUS.93Dec27120003@twitch.mit.edu>
In article <NESSUS.93Dec27120003@twitch.mit.edu> nessus@twitch.mit.edu (Douglas Alan) writes: >In article <m0pDKXG-000ilqC@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu> >chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams) writes: > >> Several people have used this "research" as an excuse to pour >> hundreds of lines of nonsense verbage only tangentally related to >> the song onto rec.music.gaffa. > >The only tangentially Kate-related excess verbiage I have seen >recently is by one Chris Williams, who insists on trying to cram his >religious views down everyone else's throat. > [Stuff deleted] > >Long tirades on whether specific (or general) religious views are >correct is *NOT* appropriate in this forum. > Here, here! For one who doesn't believe in God, Chris, you should question believing in yourself, for surely someone who assumes omniscience in such matters is espousing godlike characteristics himself. Steve (the agnostic) ** The difference between atheists and agnostics is that agnostics are smart enough to realize that there are some things that _can_ never and _will_ never be proved or disproved--so they don't waste time debating over it! ** From: silo@aol.com Wed Dec 29 16:26:32 1993 From: silo@aol.com Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1993 16:24:02 -0500 X-Mailer: America Online Mailer Reply-To: silo@aol.com Message-ID: <9312291623.tn18701@aol.com> Subject: Re: Stupid "panties" phrase Lines: 12 Vickie writes: >>Don't get your panties in an uproar. > >Where did this silly phrase come from? SNL? The first time I heard it >in rec.music.gaffa was courtesy of Cynthia Rosas in 1991 (I think) and >I keep hearing it over and over again. I'd really like to know where it >originated. I seem to remember seeing it in Ghostbusters. --Mike Knight