Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-49 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: rhogan@chaph.usc.edu (Ron Hogan)
Date: 30 Nov 1993 19:17:51 -0800
Subject: Re: Is Kate goofy?
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.UU.NET
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
References: <9312010142.AA00713@bugs.TQS.COM>
Sender: rhogan@chaph.usc.edu
steve.b@TQS.COM (Steve Berlin) writes: >In the past, Kate has songs that either mention or are heavily influenced >by - how should I put it - weirdos. Gurdjieff, Reich, "Strange Phenomena", >etc. And now apparently "Lily" is based on something by the biggest >weirdo of all, Alister Crowley. >My question: Does Kate actually BELIEVE this stuff? Or does she just think >it's a good basis for a song? I mean, I don't believe in Orogones any >more than I do, say, the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, or God, yet I think >"Cloudbusting" is a great song. Is that how Kate looks at it? Or is >she goofy? (Unfortunately, all evidence points this way, yet there is >always hope...) Perhaps we could lock her in an insane asylum until she conforms. Does it really matter whether any of us subscribe to her particular theological/religious/spiritual views, or if we think they're kooky? I think the resurrection is kind of weird, but I don't think Amy Grant's a loony -- why should I think Kate is weird just because she's apparently read Reich and Crowley? I won't touch the argument about whether Crowley and the others are weirdos or not -- that more properly belongs in alt.magick or some other forum -- but it still seems like you're making a pretty judgmental leap. Ron Hogan