Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-31 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 22:14 CDT
Subject: Re: Kate vs. Tori
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
In-Reply-To: <9308262233.AA17069@relay1.UU.NET>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: FCIA Univ. of Chicago
In article <9308262233.AA17069@relay1.UU.NET> you write: >Chris Williams writes: "...I feel the need to compare female artists in an >exclusionary manner is unconscious sexism. To insist that artist "A" is >brilliant while slagging artist "B" seems to be based on some notion that >female brilliance is somehow "limited" and that there simply isn't enough to go >around." > >Please explain. If a male says artist "A" (male) is brilliant while artist "B" >(male) is terrible, does this mean (according to your statement) that he is >unconsciously homophobic?.....or if a male says that artist "A" (female) is >brilliant while artist "B" male is terrible, does this mean he is somehow >lacking in male hormones?...or if a male says that artist "A" (male) is >brilliant while artist "B" (female) is terrible, does this mean he is >unconsciously a transvestite?.....or maybe that human brilliance is somehow >"limited"? I find your link between comparisons (even exclusionary ones) and >sexism to be poorly worded. Ok, I'll try to state it more clearly. It seems impossible for critics and most listeners to describe female singers without comparing one to another. Now this would seem reasonable enough, that comparisons are necessary for the listener to be able to have a point of reference. But look through any magazine with a large number of reviews, and you will notice that the male singers are not often compared with one another (other than obvious idolatry, Harry Connik and Frank Sinatra for example.) But try to find a review of a female singer without pigion-hole comparisons to to at least one other female singer. Why is this? The answer may be different than the one I proposed, but the evidence is fairly clear. "Kate vs. Tori" is inevitable if the culture doesn't recognize individual women as individual *people*. Tori Amos is no more like Kate Bush than Peter Gabrael is like Todd Rundgren. The differences between both sets are greater than the similarities, but no one seems to need to make the same sort of comparisons. I am a big fan of Kate Bush, Tori Amos, Jane Siberry, Sarah McLachlan and a number of other female artists. I have sometimes been guilty of comparing one to another, usually to point out differences, but I try to avoid it, as not to belittle each woman's individual talent. Chris Williams of Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (his) vickie@njin.rutgers.edu (hers) katefans@chinet.chinet.com (ours)