Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-26 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Jackie Zucconi <lionhart@netlink.cts.COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 18:38:32 PDT
Subject: clarifing a point
To: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA
Vicki stated that she makes copies of individual songs not entire albums (when she does an album it's rarely). Well, just to clarify, even copying one song is still in violation of copyright laws; I wasn't sure if you understood that from the way you worded your post. Please don't take this as a condemnation of your practices I'm merely trying to explain the law (as far as I understand it). I hope this clears up any confusion in the minds of all Love-Hounds. On a personal note I think there needs to be a major overhaul in the laws concerning music and book publication. Litigation has taken things to the point where professors are hard pressed to give copies of Seutonius without risk of being sued from some publishing house. Atleast for books there is a point (determined by a page ratio) as to when copying is illegal, music doesn't seem to have this "cutting off point." Also, did anyone catch MTV's 120 Minutes on the night/morning of13/14? There seems to be a striking similarity between a Killing Joke song and a recent Nirvana hit...watch the legal press for any pending suits! Kateness, Lionheart -- INTERNET: lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi) UUCP: ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115