Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-43 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: lazlo%triton.unm.edu@lynx.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1991 09:48:46 -0800
Subject: Re: Ben's post
To: <love-hounds@WIRETAP.SPIES.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Studio Nibble, Manchester (It's Grim Up North)
References: <m0khdsp-00024DC@chinet.chi.il.us>
katefans@chinet.chi.il.us (Vickie) writes: > I just wonder what would happen if *all* stores refused to carry labeled > albums. This possibility is not as ludicrous as it sounds, since that's essentially what's happening in the video industry. As Blockbuster eats up more and more mom-n-pop operations, there are more and more smaller communities where Blockbuster is the only video store around. Blockbuster has an especially egregious policy of not stocking unrated, NC-17 and "controversial" movies, and they're moving towards getting special cuts made of R movies that don't meet their "family standards". (Yes, they're big enough now that they have that kind of clout.) I don't care about niggling "dictionary definitions" of what censorship is -- if a shop responds to political or economic pressure to stop carrying something that they would, under ordinary circumstances, carry, I consider that a close enough cousin to censorship that the difference isn't worth mentioning. Labeling and ratings codes just help that process along. -- Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu) "Let's save the virgins!" "Awww, let's help DynaPink."