Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-34 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1991 11:55:07 -0700
To: gaffa-post@eddie.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Path: kjetilho From: kjetilho@ifi.uio.no (Kjetil Torgrim Homme) Subject: Re: subscriptions In-Reply-To: rhill@pnet01.cts.COM's message of 29 Sep 91 08:25:41 GMT Message-ID: <KJETILHO.91Sep30195449@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no> Sender: kjetilho@ifi.uio.no (Kjetil Torgrim Homme) Organization: University of Oslo, Norway References: <m0kQx7b-0000oPC@crash.cts.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1991 18:54:59 GMT Lines: 35 In article <m0kQx7b-0000oPC@crash.cts.com> rhill@pnet01.cts.COM (Ronald Hill) writes: > Does anybody have any reliable subscription figures for Love-Hounds, > Homeground, the KBC, or any of the other Kate Bush places? Here's some data from the august arbitron, ie. the statistics for rec.music.gaffa on Usenet. I've included some other conferences for reference. +-- Estimated total number of people who read the group, worldwide. | +-- Actual number of readers in sampled population | | +-- Propagation: how many sites receive this group at all | | | +-- Recent traffic (messages per month) | | | | +-- Recent traffic (kilobytes per month) | | | | | +-- Crossposting percentage | | | | | | +-- Cost ratio: $US/month/reader | | | | | | | +-- Share: % of newsrders | | | | | | | | who read this group. V V V V V V V V 54 60000 1348 83% 1388 2145.6 15% 0.05 3.9% rec.music.misc 134 40000 913 83% 503 708.6 12% 0.03 2.7% rec.music.cd 189 35000 785 83% 977 1896.8 5% 0.08 2.3% rec.music.synth 243 29000 657 83% 411 593.8 9% 0.03 1.9% rec.music.folk 257 28000 627 82% 1224 1781.6 1% 0.09 1.8% rec.music.gdead 371 21000 472 80% 145 192.2 9% 0.01 1.4% rec.music.newage 546 14000 328 81% 266 697.8 0% 0.07 1.0% rec.music.gaffa ========================================================================= 663 10000 227 57% 421 725.4 4% 0.07 0.7% rec.music.industrial So, I guess the Usenet bunch outnumbers the others :-) Kjetil T. "This is what you want, this is what you get."