Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-34 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1991 11:55:07 -0700
To: gaffa-post@eddie.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Path: kjetilho
From: kjetilho@ifi.uio.no (Kjetil Torgrim Homme)
Subject: Re: subscriptions
In-Reply-To: rhill@pnet01.cts.COM's message of 29 Sep 91 08:25:41 GMT
Message-ID: <KJETILHO.91Sep30195449@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>
Sender: kjetilho@ifi.uio.no (Kjetil Torgrim Homme)
Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
References: <m0kQx7b-0000oPC@crash.cts.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1991 18:54:59 GMT
Lines: 35
In article <m0kQx7b-0000oPC@crash.cts.com> rhill@pnet01.cts.COM (Ronald Hill) writes:
> Does anybody have any reliable subscription figures for Love-Hounds,
> Homeground, the KBC, or any of the other Kate Bush places?
Here's some data from the august arbitron, ie. the statistics for
rec.music.gaffa on Usenet. I've included some other conferences for
reference.
+-- Estimated total number of people who read the group, worldwide.
| +-- Actual number of readers in sampled population
| | +-- Propagation: how many sites receive this group at all
| | | +-- Recent traffic (messages per month)
| | | | +-- Recent traffic (kilobytes per month)
| | | | | +-- Crossposting percentage
| | | | | | +-- Cost ratio: $US/month/reader
| | | | | | | +-- Share: % of newsrders
| | | | | | | | who read this group.
V V V V V V V V
54 60000 1348 83% 1388 2145.6 15% 0.05 3.9% rec.music.misc
134 40000 913 83% 503 708.6 12% 0.03 2.7% rec.music.cd
189 35000 785 83% 977 1896.8 5% 0.08 2.3% rec.music.synth
243 29000 657 83% 411 593.8 9% 0.03 1.9% rec.music.folk
257 28000 627 82% 1224 1781.6 1% 0.09 1.8% rec.music.gdead
371 21000 472 80% 145 192.2 9% 0.01 1.4% rec.music.newage
546 14000 328 81% 266 697.8 0% 0.07 1.0% rec.music.gaffa
=========================================================================
663 10000 227 57% 421 725.4 4% 0.07 0.7% rec.music.industrial
So, I guess the Usenet bunch outnumbers the others :-)
Kjetil T. "This is what you want, this is what you get."