Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1990-16 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Stephen Thomas <spt1@ukc.ac.uk>
Date: 24 May 90 10:40:07 GMT
Subject: Re: _TSW_ pressings
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
References: <9005231146.AA18792@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <9005231316.AA14361@gaffa.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: Stephen Thomas <spt1@ukc.ac.uk>
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
In article <9005231316.AA14361@gaffa.MIT.EDU> Love-Hounds@gaffa.MIT.EDU writes: >Really-From: Rampant Red Food-U-Later <jsd@gaffa.MIT.EDU> > >[stuff about albums being OK rather than excellent quality deleted] > Hmm. Either you have much better aural perception that I do, or there must be some qualitative difference between UK and US pressings. My first KT album was _TSW_, followed by _HOL_, then _TKI_, _Lionheart_ and _The Dreaming_. The remaining ones I have still to acquire. I thought the sound quality of TSW was quite OK when I first got it. However, it is ages since I have listened to it, as I prefer _TD_ and _HOL_. These two albums, _TD_ in particular, I feel are very well produced. Recently I decided I would visit _TSW_ again, and realised that the production quality was indeed lacking. I almost always listen to music using headphones, and with all the albums I have apart from _TSW_ I feel that I am "in" the music. With _TSW_, the best way I can describe it is that I felt that it was going on around me, not in me. I also do not think that _TKI_ is badly produced - its seems very clear to me. It is just that the musical arrangement is a little ... sparse is the best word I can find, compared to modern productions. The same applies to _Lionheart_. Just my views, folks! Stephen -- Never give | Stephen Thomas fate an | JANET: spt1@ukc.ac.uk even chance | Telephone: +44 (0)227 764000 ext 3824 | Snail: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.