Submission for rec-music-gaffa

[root@IUVAX.CS.INDIANA.EDU (Boss Tweed)]

Article-I.D.: rutgers.9003071923.AA22679
Sender: daemon@eddie.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: Love-Hounds Anonymous
Lines: 38
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

Path: iuvax!silver!jburka
From: jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jeffrey C. Burka)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: The Laugh (here we go again)
Message-ID: <38185@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 7 Mar 90 19:23:16 GMT
References: <9003071017.AA04891@ginkgo>
Sender: root@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Reply-To: jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jeffrey C. Burka)
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Lines: 26

Neil Calton tells us:
>Now the presence of the laugh on the Love and Anger 12" clearly
>proves it has absolutely nothing to do with The Fog. Whatever the
>labels say about mixing (I do not have then yet to check the wording
>or whether anything else in the mix is different) the laugh has been
>placed with Love and Anger. Therefore you (and many others) were wrong.
>So why not admit it - you know you will feel better afterwards :-)

BUT:  if the sleeve proclaims that the 12" version that happens to be
followed by the laugh is _not_ the album version of the song, then we
have proof that the laugh does _not_ belong to Love and Anger and that they
just happened to throw it on the 12".  I liked somebody's idea that it was
a nice thing to throw between two tracks.

And it _does_ belong with "The Fog."  I don't care what _anybody_
says.


-- 
|Jeffrey C. Burka                | "On the outskirts of nowhere           |
|jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu   |  on the ringroad to somewhere,         |
|jburka@amber.ucs.indiana.edu    |  on the verge of indecision..." --Fish |

|Jeffrey C. Burka                | "On the outskirts of nowhere           |
|jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu   |  on the ringroad to somewhere,         |
|jburka@amber.ucs.indiana.edu    |  on the verge of indecision..." --Fish |