Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1990-08 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Boss Tweed <root@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 7 Mar 90 19:23:17 GMT
Subject: Submission for rec-music-gaffa
Responding-System: iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
Path: iuvax!silver!jburka From: jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jeffrey C. Burka) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: The Laugh (here we go again) Message-ID: <38185@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Date: 7 Mar 90 19:23:16 GMT References: <9003071017.AA04891@ginkgo> Sender: root@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu Reply-To: jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jeffrey C. Burka) Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington Lines: 26 Neil Calton tells us: >Now the presence of the laugh on the Love and Anger 12" clearly >proves it has absolutely nothing to do with The Fog. Whatever the >labels say about mixing (I do not have then yet to check the wording >or whether anything else in the mix is different) the laugh has been >placed with Love and Anger. Therefore you (and many others) were wrong. >So why not admit it - you know you will feel better afterwards :-) BUT: if the sleeve proclaims that the 12" version that happens to be followed by the laugh is _not_ the album version of the song, then we have proof that the laugh does _not_ belong to Love and Anger and that they just happened to throw it on the 12". I liked somebody's idea that it was a nice thing to throw between two tracks. And it _does_ belong with "The Fog." I don't care what _anybody_ says. -- |Jeffrey C. Burka | "On the outskirts of nowhere | |jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu | on the ringroad to somewhere, | |jburka@amber.ucs.indiana.edu | on the verge of indecision..." --Fish | |Jeffrey C. Burka | "On the outskirts of nowhere | |jburka@silver.ucs.indiana.edu | on the ringroad to somewhere, | |jburka@amber.ucs.indiana.edu | on the verge of indecision..." --Fish |