Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-08 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%OAC.UCLA.EDU@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 88 13:26 PDT
Subject: sugarKubes seen Through the eyes of a Katian zealoT -- an IED review
Posted-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 88 13:26 PDT
There are a few good, even very good singles on _Life's_Too_Good_. "Deus", "Birthday" and above all the powerful (though not by coincidence musically the least ambitious) "Cold Sweat" stand out for this listener. Bjork, in particular, has a talent not only for singing, but for finding unexpected corners of melody in the minimalist chordal framework of the band's music. And yet the group is not innovative in any significant sense that IED can appreciate. Their instrumental character is much like that of a dozen other Banshees-influenced European bands -- not that that isn't a good model to be influenced by. The production (not their own) creates a terrific sound for them, too. Many of the lyrics are intriguing, and despite the occasional sign of hasty construction (hampered by spotty translation, no doubt) come off as deeply felt, at least some of the time. (If only that Einar jerk would just shut up and leave Bjork to do all the singing! His snidely spoken, ill-pronounced English interruptions call to mind the embarrassing tone of the old Japanese pop band The Plastics -- he thinks he's too "cool" for the band's good.) Bjork herself is obviously a compelling vocalist. But these qualities are what constitute the group's greatest weakness: they can be isolated and defined with ease. When you listen to the whole album through, it becomes all too clear that, despite the occasional odd intrusion of brass and a cute remix or two, the Sugarcubes are a band with one and only one sound. The rhythm section, for example, is tuned and tempered in precisely the same way on each track -- like virtually every rock band working today. And for all her personal style, Bjork tends to revert to the same handful of vocal jumps, twists and affectations on each successive track, instead of searching for the requirements of the song itself. It's as if they never even thought about the challenges which an album poses -- and it's as if they'd never really paid serious attention to _The_Dreaming_ or _Hounds_of_Love_! Recognize also the undeniable mediocrity of at least half of the songs themselves, and the extremely minimal number of musical ideas on even the best tracks ("Cold Sweat", for example, consists simply of an eight-bar verse phrase and a four-bar chorus, repeated three or four times. The instrumental "bridge" is nothing more than another run-through of the verse's "chord" structure <basically one chord>.) Take these crucial weaknesses into account and you can see how wide and cavernous is the gap that separates a band like the Sugarcubes from Katey. And yet it's pretty clear that the Sugarcubes are one of the most imaginative bands working today. It's pathetic. -- Andrew Marvick, already hearing whiny protests of "Whoa, dude! Wuddabout the Buttholes?" and "Butchew forgot AC/DC, dude!" in upcoming Love-Hounds, and not worried about it.