Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-05 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 88 10:22 PDT
Subject: MisK.
Welcome, Stephen Nicholson. Good to hear there is a real KonsTituency down there. > I love Colourbox, so lighten up "IED". > -- Jon Drukman No offense meant, but goddammit, Jon, IED is getting very frustrated at seeing your name on a header, getting his hopes raised thereby that he is about to read a new and interesting little posting about some important Kate-bushological issue, only to discover that you haven't even been _listening_ to Kate lately, but to...to..."COLOURBOX"!! (Sorry, he couldn't resist the quotation marks one last time.) > Oh yeah, another thing. Has Kate revealed the contents of the > backwards message in WYWM yet? Can it be that three years of > scholarly effort has left us with only a partial possible solution? > Only three shopping weeks to KaTemas. Will she give up Kit-Kats > and start watching `thirtysomething'? Lord only knows. > > -- Dave Hsu, braaaaayn thpecialitht dhsu@sun.com No, there's been no solution to "WYWM"'s message, so far. You can be sure you'll hear about it in L-Hs as soon as it happens. Speaking of good Kate-related postings, where have _you_ been all these months, Dave? Let's see a new, in-depth Kate-analysis from you soon, why not, huh, ok? Say, and what about Michael Knight, and Joe Turner, and Tippi Chai? What the fuck have _they_ been doing Kate-wise lately??? The word "fickle" comes to mind... > Also, what is all this about deteriorating CDs? I thought the > cited radio report was tongue in cheek. Presumably there would have > to be a pretty noticeable crack in the plastic to expose the > aluminium, and even then it should not oxidise markedly if well > stored. I suppose this is what happens if you make things in > Swindon :-) they deteriorate after a few decades or so :-( Sounds pretty far-fetched, this ink-corrosion thing, no? Of course, "laser rot" is very common in the twelve-inch (laser-disk) size, but as IED understood it, that problem arises usually from the increased tension resulting from the anti-warp designs in the larger-sized disks: various plastic compounds have been tried over the years, with differing degrees of success, and Pioneer _claims_ that they've got the problem licked, though IED for one still comes across plenty of laser rot in new releases. > "cover" by the New American Orch. (whatever that is) in 1982. If > you want the real sound track, the best way to get is to spend the > bucks ($80 maybe?) and get the laser disk version of the movie. If all you want is the soundtrack, then don't spend $80.00 on the CAV laser-disk version of the movie, just get the regular CLV version -- it's only $35.00. Of course, the picture is chopped off on either side and you get no special effects, plus the stereo sound isn't quite as fine as on the $80.00 version (though it's still nearly CD-quality). > Then you have to buy, beg, borrow, whatever, a laser disk player, > etc. (There are some new players comming out which play formats > including CDs, CDVs, etc., but they run $1000 to $2000; oh well, > someday...) Actually, there's a "combo" player out already from Pioneer (the 1030) that sells around L.A. for well under $700 now, and the prices will soon be coming down, since Sony, Yamaha and Sansui have all introduced competitive machines to the U.S. market recently. Meanwhile the basic (amazingly great) Pioneer digital-sound laser-disk-only player (model 838D) is now only about $400 in some stores. > The next step is to dub the music over to a tape. The laser disk > version of Blade Runner I've seen doesn't fill out TV screen top to > bottom so you get the original aspect ratio of the movie. If you > have a player with stop action, you can take a good look at all the > effects, etc. There's some pretty interesting stuff in that movie. > -- Rich That's putting it mildly. The _Ninth_Wave_ of science fiction movies, really. (Maybe _Brazil_, then, is _The_Dreaming_...) Oh, yeah, the "letterbox" version you just described also has all kinds of fun trivia quizzes and Syd Mead drawings, etc., on side 4, plus an amazingly comprehensive Blade-Runner-ological bibliography and essay by some nutty fan who's worse off than IED in his respective field of obsessive study. (That's right, _worse_! No kidding.) -- Andrew Marvick [ Okay, so what is *Alien* translated into record albums? --|>oug ]