Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1985-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: harvard!topaz!jerpc.PE.UUCP
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 85 01:25:19 edt
Subject: Re: Re: Cat food?
> Easy. Decide that it is immoral to kill an animal for food and > then stop eating meat. [For a start, you could decide that it > is immoral to take calves, force them to live in small, totally > dark boxes with their legs tied for a few months and then slaughter > them. That is why veal is so tender.] Even I myself don't believe in eating veal, for this reason. However, I have to be realistic about other animals that are good for eating. Likewise, I always stay out of the ocean here, to avoid sharks, and out of the lakes to avoid amoebas, which would consider me edible. > When I do something for moral reasons it is not done to affect > how others act, it is done so that I believe I am doing the > correct thing. I don't steal cars (for moral reasons), but that > has nothing to do with whether someone steals my car -- and the > reason I don't steal cars is in not to protect my own car from > being stolen. Your analogy does not make sense. That's because it had a lot of implicit stuff behind it. The idea of not eating meat for moral reasons is a very difficult one. Animals don't behave immorally because they have no "moral principles" to abide by. However, people do. Well, then you have to get into whether moral relativism is the "real thing", in which case you can do more or less anything for moral reasons, and I don't have to if I don't agree with your morals; or assume that moral principles are absolute, in which case you have to decide which to abide by. Personally, I believe in absolute moral principles, and the ones that I personally abide by say that a long time ago it was immoral to eat animals, but now it's not. My analogy (such as it was) was more along the lines of "why have sympathy for animals that would eat you if they had the opportunity?" > Could you describe this "vegetarian demeanor" better? I want to > find out if I have it. (Moral reasons are part of the basis for > my being a vegetarian.) I have never known any male people who were vegetarians! So it is hard for me to say what male vegetarian types are like. Our secretary at work is a vegetarian; also an XSO of mine; also someone I used to work with. I also knew a vegetarian who doesn't fit the above characteristics, but she was a hypocrite who was a vegetarian just because she thought it would help her get into medical school; she also made me eat unsalted peanut butter.* Anyhow, all the vegetarians I have known have just had this way of behaving and of speaking, which was very distinct; they were sort of shy, very quiet, but underlying this quietness, they had strong opinions which they just didn't express unless prompted a good bit. They were always very warm and wholesome individuals. (There are some other examples I have known that fit the above characteristic; in fact, only the one, that I knew of, who was different). But beneath this very subtle and quiet surface, they were always very complex. They always seemed fundamentally in touch with the Human Experience, somehow. > I would suggest a survey to find out how many members of this > list are write-only members, but the write-only members would > never read about it! One of the problems of trying to be civil is that one can't very well be discourteous to someone else just because they have been discourteous to you. Thus, when someone is discourteous to me, all I can do is not afford them the consideration I afford others. Thus you can identify write-only members by being alert to key-words like "ingrate" and "uncivilized" in certain of my postings... :-), as they say. Of course, the above paragraph doesn't apply to any person in particular, and is just a general commentary on dealing with people who ask a favor of you, then when you go to lots of trouble for them, don't even say "thank you" or acknowledge that you did all that for them, so that you are left in the uncomfortable position of not knowing whether what you had done was received at all, or whether it was, so to speak, merely poorly received. I've always taken silence as a sign of either arrogance or elitism, myself; but that is just my own shortcoming. "We let the wierdness in." -- jer *She was the "food manager" at the "eating house" where I ate in college.