Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-36 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: mizzell@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:23:54 GMT
Subject: Kate does commercials!!
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc.
Sender: owner-love-hounds
Boy, was I surprised! Did anybody else know this? ************************************************** >From an article in the July 16, 1996 "Shoot" magazine. ...concerning buying tracks from artist to use in commercials ""...many agencies shy away from contacting original artist. Andrew Chinich, executive producer and head of the broadcast department at TBWA Chiat/Day in New York, says that it's because "people think it's more money, but it's not. I don't pay an artist more than I pay a music house." He also notes that it can be cost-effective compared to copping the rights to a well known hit. "Buying a track has become so prohibitive, " Chinich says. "One piece of music, with sync rights, can be half a million dollars." Part of the problem is that all but the most powerful artist are under such strict contracts that the record companies frequently set the terms and often take the lion's share of any commercial money. In fact, Chinich went directly to Kate Bush to purchase one of her earlier hits. "I told her, "I could give $250,000 to Sony or I can throw it at you." Unlike many less-established bands, Bush had enough clout as an artist to take the deal. Kate scored last year's entire U.S. campaign for Fruitopia, creating about a dozen original tunes. For the British version, he secured ethereal synth-popsters, Cocteau Twins, a popular band on that side of the pond." ******************************************** I've seen these spots. They are beautifully done and I thought the sound had a familiar feel to it. Now I know! As a commercial composer myself, there a lot of issues to discuss here if anybody wants to jump in! I'm glad that Sony didn't get the money!