Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-33 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Xenu's Sister" <vickie@miso.wwa.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 16:07:25 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Deeper Understanding
To: Love-Hounds <Love-Hounds@gryphon.com>
Beware: of Scientology and Dianetics
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960801032409.006a5c40@relay.starnet.net.ar>
Loves: Kate Bush/Happy Rhodes/Jane Siberry/Tori Amos/Peter Gabriel/Sarah McLachlan/Victoria Williams
Sender: owner-love-hounds
Web: http://miso.wwa.com/~vickie/
On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Gonzalo Balerdi wrote: > > Hi all, > > C'on guys... don't try to defend the undefendable. IMHO, DU is by far her > worst song. Your opinion doesn't make it true, of course. I happen to love DU for many reasons, not least of which is the Trio Bulgarka. > The melody is quite good, but she spoiled it with all the beeps > beeps and the silly lyrics. It's the one Kate song I just can't listen to. > > Again, that's IMHO. Certainly. I wish I had time to write an essay on this, but my time is extremely limited right now (I shouldn't even be reading this thread, but I needed a break). By "this" I mean my feeling that Kate put a bit of herself in this song. Sure, it's fictional, but Kate says she only writes songs about subjects that she feels connected to emotionally, so everything she does has a whiff of the "real" Kate in some way or another, be it a movie she was blown away by, a book she was fascinated by, subjects that she's interested in, ideas that got her creative juices flowing, etc.. This is *PURE CONJECTURE* on my part, not based on *ANYTHING* concrete, such as interviews, but I can imagine a scenario such as... Kate's a perfectionist, which is one aspect of an obvsessive personality. Kate's a musician, who takes her work seriously. Kate learned everything she could about producing, and she knows her way around the studio far more than most other artists. She was immediately taken with the Fairlight, fascinated with it. She got bothered by having to use a borrowed Fairlight, and went out and bought her own. Now, when someone gets something new, something that's complex, and something that they're going to be using extensively in their work, work that they're a perfectionist about, what would they do? They'd learn how to use it. They'd spend *hours*, *days*, *weeks*, however long it takes, to learn how to use it, learn what it does, learn how to make it do exactly what they want it to do. It's not too hard to picture Kate spending massive amounts of time just fiddling with the Fairlight until she knew what every single knob, button, key did. Until she knew all the sounds it could make, and what to do to get it to make the sounds *she* wanted. It's not too hard to imagine Kate being in a "Fairlight obsessed" mode until she was satisfied with her knowledge of it. Given that first part of the scenario, it's not too hard to imagine Kate, years later, pulling up the memory of that obsession to incorporate it into the fictional fantasy of the obesssed character in DU. As I said, all that is pure conjecture, but the feelings that Kate expresses in DU ring true to me, so I *don't* think the lyrics are silly. It's a fantasy, as are many of Kate's songs, but there's enough reality-based emotions within the song to make it interesting, give it an edge, and (for me at least) hit home. Just some thoughts. Vickie (who *knows* about being unnaturally obessed about computer stuff)