Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-30 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Len Bullard <cbullard@HiWAAY.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 15:39:01 -0500
Subject: Kate Pages or How We Beat the Authors into the Will Of Gaffa
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
CC: woj@remus.rutgers.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Lockheed Martin
Reply-To: cbullard@HiWAAY.net
Sender: owner-love-hounds
len sez: >Burkhard has included <noframes> and _top attributes. >well, this is what is in the <noframes> tag: > KATE BUSH PAGE OF BURKHARD SIEDHOFF > Yes, but he used it. That's a start. >Kate Bush Page - content: Kate Bush Gallery, Kate Bush CDs, Kate Bush >collection, Offered and wanted, Factsheet, The Kick Inside, Lionheart, Never >For Ever, The Dreaming, Hounds of Love, The Whole Story, The Sensual World, >This Woman's Work, The Red Shoes >These pages are only visible with frames browsers! >Use Netscape 2.0 or higher, Microsoft Explorer 3.0 or Oracle Power Browser 1.0 And he told you what to expect. Everyone out there is extending HTML. The HTML working group has apparently gone to hell, and the ensuing knife fight has no rules. At least he got a page up and it is about Kate. The bloody webReligion_HTMLisHoly position just makes us ducks on an interstate. The KateWorlds are now going to be in four new multimedia books including one in Japan. Hooray. But for my purposes, this is working very nicely. Call that selfish or anything you like, but every Kate page, regardless of a WebNazi deciding it sucks or belongs in the "Extra" pages section is a prize for Cathy Bush. Suits me fine. >which is hardly informative for someone looking for a "great KaTe >page". Who rules? The author chose. Fine. Gad. >i didn't see any _top attributes in the main page. did you? I'll go back and look again. I use Netscape. The power is there. Well, I can use Microsoft and their extensions, I guess, but as a VRML artist, that isn't a good choice. If a page comes up and I don't have or want the plugin, I say, fine. Next. Every sperm ain't sacred. >What else do the frame-impaired require? >the least he could do was put the html from kate012.htm into <noframes> >so we don't have to dig through his source file to find the real main >page's location. Good suggestion. Let's politely request that and see what happens. If we beat these people up for doing a *good thing*, how the blazes will we get them to keep going? A little sugar in the tea, please. ... hmm, as a practicing diabetic, I may have to rethink that... good news; the talosian spaceport attached to the kate page won the grand prize in the IDS Build A Better World contest. new t-shirt and a set of bridgestones for the van. ;-) len