Re: Angry Kate (was: Mailbag)

[delius@ldd.net]

masstn95@Student.UmU.SE (Magnus Stromgren) wrote:

>willker@chemie.uni-bremen.de (Wieland Willker) wrote:

>>An angry Kate? This just reminds me of a little article: 
>>
>>-----------------
>>Daily Mirror, Sunday Feb. 17th 1990
>>
>>Bush Wack
>>Sultry singer Kate Bush doesn't look in the mood to say cheese as she finds
>>herself staring into photographer Robin Kennedy's lens. 
>>A few moments later it was Kate who snapped - with a well aimed boot up the
>>cameraman's backside. The pop star had to be restrained by long-time
>>boyfriend Del Palmer as she and Kennedy bumped into each other outside a
>>London nightspot. Afterwards the cameraman said: "I didn't think that
>>anyone so small would be able to kick so hard."
>>-------------------

>>Alive and kicking, heh?
>>The article is accompanied with a heavy shot. A really angry KaTe. Woah!
>>She's very furious! Very! Nothing "I'm quite a happy little soul"... more
>>an outburst of the lion. Be careful! This was serious anger not fun! 
>>For all that she looks somewhat BEAUTIFUL! 
>>I'm bewildered... (she must be...  mmh)

>If we are to believe Fred Vermorel ;-), this must be an age thing. In his Kate-related 
>magnum opus, "The Secret History of Kate Bush..." (1983), he writes in a footnote 
>something to the effect of that she doesn't seem to understand anger, or even know 
>what it is.


>Magnus Stromgren
>____________________
>(masstn95@student.umu.se)
>Umea, Northern Sweden


or maybe flashing cameras just get old after awhile.  she should have
smashed his camera and shoved it up his ass.  after everything she has
said over the years, people still don't understand the word privacy.