Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-35 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: mdean@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael W. Dean)
Date: 2 Nov 1995 14:57:33 GMT
Subject: Re: The Red Shoes
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
References: <9510251846.aa28433@srvwingb.sco.com>
In article <9510251846.aa28433@srvwingb.sco.com>, Craig Heath <craig@sco.COM> wrote: >> From: mdean@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael W. Dean) >> Date: 24 Oct 1995 01:12:35 GMT > >> Let's look at it this way: who here thinks of The Red Shoes as Kate's >> absolute best work ever? > >Actually, I do. While it's probably not the most adventurous album*, I find >it the most moving. I am constantly astonished at the emotional resonances >Kate manages to conjure up, as much with the music as the lyrics. Some of >it can be analysed (like the "Whiter Shade of Pale" references), and I think >it helps being "of an age" with Kate, i.e. thirty-something, but for the >most part, how and why this happens is a complete mystery to me. > It was almost inevitable that to someone out there, The Red Shoes would be tops. Hell, there's folks out there to whom Lionheart is the leader. Reading this group, however, I get the feeling that The Red Shoes is a little more middling, while Hounds and Dreaming are more favored (I don't know if anyone did a tally of the old "Rate Kate" thread, but that's what I remember). Mike .......