Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-32 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Norman Buchwald <jbuchwald@csun.edu>
Date: 7 Oct 1995 19:47:12 GMT
Subject: Re: Where there's smoke, there's flaming.
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: none
References: <Pine.3.89.9510031732.C11409-0100000@cd.cd.columbus.oh.us> <44v35b$7fe@news.ios.com>
maitreya@village.ios.com (Philip Verdieck) wrote: >Stuart M. Castergine (scasterg@cd.columbus.oh.us) wrote: > > It could be >: that kate took images and perspectives that don't quite match and blended >: them. > >Excuse me, you mean KaTe sometimes takes images and perspectives that >don't match???? > > > The term for that is juxtaposition, one of the most important elements for the work of any artist, really. Taking any images and perspectives that don't quite go together and placing them side by side. Kate's songs are loaded with such juxtapositions. I mean the music background of "All The Love" and the sense of reincarnation, concluded with messages of "goodbye" on an answering machine? Every artist creates their own world. Yeats is one poet who has developed schemes and gives clues to the reader of seeing his work, but most artists don't have the schemes available. See? Critics do have a purpose on this earth-- at least as far as technique is concerned. As long as they don't spend too much time "judging" and focus more on "interpreting" to figure out the words a writer puts on the page, the melodies the songwriter creates, etc. Stormin' Norman