RE: I question your innocence mission

["Forward, Jonathan" <JForward@sitgbsd1.telecom.com.au>]

  >  From: love-hounds-request
  >  To: love-hounds
  >  Subject: I question your innocence mission
  >  Date: Sunday, 27 August 1995 2:43PM
  >
  >  Kateknight@aol.com (KateKnight) drooled:
  >
  >  >                            I don't know, but it seems to me there is 
an
  >  >AWFUL LOT of discussion regarding OTHER ARTISTS at this site. Sure, 
we're
  >  >all politically correct (artistically correct?) denizens, obliged to 
share
  >  >major info we pick up from Entertainment Tonight or the unshaven dude 
at
  >  >the local independent record shop, but is this a place to worship THE
  >  >GODDESS, or what??!!
  >  [More idiotic blathering deleted]

 [translates to Stev0 is all out of Prozac]

  >  Hey, Uli, a few FAQs that I forgot to include:
  >
  >  Q: Is it OK to talk about other artists on Lovehounds?
  >  A: Yes.  It is encouraged.

 Manet? Monet?

  >  Q: Even at length?
  >  A: Yes.  Well, don't go TOO far - posting multi-megabyte
  >     discographies is frowned on (and yes, people have done
  >     that).  Use your judgement.
  >
  >  Q: Can I even talk about Tori Amos?
  >  A: Yes, you can even talk about Tori Amos.

 Except the word Kate must not appear in the same posting. Anywhere.

  >  Q: What about Happy Rhodes?
  >  A: Er, that will be all for today...
  >
  >  - Stev0 the Ectophobe
  >
  >  "If Lovehounds is a game, I win"

 Ah yes, but what's the prize?