Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-06 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Fiona McQuarrie <fmcquarr@upei.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 15:49:50 -0400 (AST)
Subject: Totally Non-Kate (sorry)
To: "Kate (list) Bush" <love-hounds@uunet.uu.net>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
This has nothing to do with Kate directly and I apologize and I know I flame people on other lists for doing this....but I can't let this pass. Catharine MacKinnon's anti-porn statute is NOT 'the law in Canada'. The law in Canada covering such questions is regional AND national (e.g. each province has the right to censor materials it considers unsuitable for that area; there is also the power to censor nationally, i.e. to stop material from entering the country.) I am hard pressed to think of any national or provincial statute that even vaguely resembles the MacKinnon statute - the law here, at least in application, is as jumbled and inconsistent as in the US. I have seen a couple of articles in the US press along these lines lately making Canada out to be some sort of censors' paradise, and while I will admit that Canada Customs displays no rhyme or reason in deciding what can or cannot enter the country, I would not for a minute argue that it is worse here than in the US. ObKate: the vagaries of Canada Customs can be seen in the mysterious impounding of the Canadian masters for the tapetree! "ooh! a woman in a gold body stocking! lock that one up!" ;) Cheers, Fiona