Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-41 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: mk59200@cs.tut.fi (Markku Kolkka)
Date: 19 Dec 1994 16:11:43 GMT
Subject: Re: And So Is Love - Limited Editon
To: rec-music-gaffa@funet.fi
In-reply-to: JAbusheery@aol.com's message of Fri, 16 Dec 1994 15:06:43 -0500
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Tampere University of Technology (CS)
References: <941216150542_7902771@aol.com>
>>>>> "JAbusheery" == JAbusheery <JAbusheery@aol.com> writes: > The only thing I don't like about the prints is the fact that > they are so grainy. They aren't grainy (like an over-enlarged photo), they are _aliased_, like a low-resolution computer display. All curved lines have a clear "staircase" look. > Isn't it possible to take a frame from a > video and make a print without it looking this way? Yes, but the result would be fuzzy instead. > Did Kate want it this way? Did some marketing exec at EMI think this > would look more artsy? Or did they blow-up the photos to get a > close-up of her and it resulted in the photos looking this way? All of these seem rather unlikely. Maybe grabbing digital still frames from a videotape was the cheapest/fastest way to get the shots. I wish they had taken the trouble to get the frames from the film version. -- Markku Kolkka