Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-35 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IEDSRI@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 1994 17:24:25 -0400
Subject: Questions
To: Love-Hounds@uunet.uu.net
Sender: IEDSRI@aol.com
The worthy Chris Williams writes: > The basic idea was to make one in the 9660 format, > so that it would be compatible with DOS, Windows, Mac, > Amiga, Unix and NeXT. We would have to find viewers for > all these in order to make the hypertext stuff work. One > idea: a WWW compatible system. Mosiac allows browsing > locally, and versions exist for all these formats. So, > produce the entire thing in HTML, include archives of > WWW browsers for each of the formats on the disk with > standard picture viewers and sound players. Hey, maybe > Coke would be interested in tossing a little funding our > way to include the Fruitopia ads! IED is new to and still largely ignorant of these technological issues, so has a foolish question. Does the above information mean that Uli or Chris knows that the Whole Story CD-ROM contains more than just transfers of the majority of Kate Bush's official videos into the digital domain ? IED was under the impression that this CD-ROM was really more of a video compilation in CD-ROM form than a full-fledged CD-ROM. By the way, IED naturally assumes that Chris and Uli are merely suggesting the use of Mosaic as an access medium for hypertext content (if there is any) on the CD-ROM, and not proposing to upload the official videos contained on the CD-ROM so that they might be accessed by WWW users. Is this correct? Since the latter would not differ in any but a technological way from poor Marcel Rijs's proposal that a dub of TCTCTL might be included in a hypothetical L-Hs Coll. Vol. 2, IED is confident that only the former was suggested. Finally, since no-one else has seen fit to say it, IED is compelled to observe that, Chris's dudgeon notwithstanding, the fine gradations of ethical code put forth here the other day by its Master Editor to justify the Love-Hounds Collection's many copyright infringements and, by comparison, to condemn Marcel's mere words, failed to convince this skeptic. IED greatly appreciates the many fine contributions which Marcel has made to Love-Hounds to date, and sincerely hopes he will not be bowed by the heat his recent ideas about the Collection have engendered. Armored in advance to receive without further objeKTion the inevitable flames, Andrew Marvick remains your servant, IED