Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-18 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: ruppen@kitagawa.qal.berkeley.edu (Andy Ruppenstein)
Date: 19 Jun 1994 23:01:01 GMT
Subject: Re: Copyright
To: rec-music-gaffa@agate.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Meredith (meth@delphi.com) writes concerning the t-shirt design: >Seriously, though, does the copyright extend to any image of Kate? No, it doesn't. As the plans stands, swiping an image from off of any of her albums to use on the t-shirt deal is copyright infringement. This is because the images themselves are inherently copyrightable, and the rights to those particular images are no doubt held by either the photographer who took the photos, or Novercia, or EMI, or somebody. And to those who say that this t-shirt deal is a not-for-profit deal and therefore exempt from copyright law - that is irrelevant. Copyright isn't just about money - it's also about protecting the artist from having their works expropriated without their consent. In practice, it may not matter much though, because I doubt the owners of the copyright would care about a couple of dozen t-shirts. But still, it's not something to recommend doing without the permission from the appropriate people. As for copyright extending to any image of Kate? No, definitely not. Any of us can take a pencil to paper and draw an image of Kate and, voila! - you now have an image of her to which _you_ own the copyright. (It's inherent, remember.) Meaning you're then free to stick said image on a t-shirt. And hey, if you're as bad as I am with a pencil, then you could use a photograph of her which you (or someone else, with their permission) took. That's it in a nutshell. Of course, if you wanted to make it harder and see what other laws you could run afoul of, use an image of her on the t-shirt with a Budweiser beer can in hand and a cartoon balloon with Kate saying, "Whenever I'm running up that hill, I drink Bud!" That is to say, there are laws against certain uses of images, but the t-shirt project was not close to breaking those. But really, it would do better for those doing the t-shirt to come up with their own image to use. Certainly on the Richard Thompson mailing list someone was able to come up with a perfectly lovely design for their t-shirt, and there's no reason why the lovehounds couldn't do the same. Andy / ruppen@qal.berkeley.eud [Standard disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, nor do I pretend to be. Feel free to correct any of the above. I'm not responsible for any actions, etc....]