Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Alex Gibbs <arg@kilimanjaro.opt-sci.Arizona.EDU>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 05:00:19 -0700
Subject: Re: The Dead Bird
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: fmcquarr@upei.ca's message of Thu, 7 Apr 1994 15:06:56 -0400
References: <Pine.3.05.9404071618.A2930-a100000@atlas.cs.upei.ca>
fmcquarr@upei.ca (Fiona McQuarrie) writes: > Well, Jeffrey, believe that I too am concerned about the dead bird in > Kate's movie. From everyone's comments it sounds like it was a pretty > realistic death. Maybe it *is* special effects, but I suspect I am > not the only one who would like some official (i.e. Kate-based) > reassurance that it is indeed so. To perhaps increase information, in the "video" for ASiL there isn't a single shot where a moving bird becomes lifeless. A bird does hit a dingy window and _flutters_ downward, off camera. This seems to be the main shot where a bird could have been injured. The camera was fixed on a couple panes of a huge, wall-sized window, like of a studio, and the bird hit there. It certainly looks real but it would seem rather difficult to get this shot without some sort of preparation or tricks. After that there are shots of a dead bird, almost certainly a real one. It's probably stuffed since I doubt they would make a fake one when there are already stuffed ones anyway and it seems rather stiff too. A bird is never shown actually dying or obviously injured anyway. Hope this helps.