Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-08 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: afcpeters@aol.com (AFC PeterS)
Date: 7 Mar 1994 19:07:04 -0500
Subject: Re: TRS Peeve & Cocteau Twins Review
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.UU.NET
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Posted-Date: 7 Mar 1994 19:07:04 -0500
References: <9403071900.AA00843@MOLLYBLOOM.MSFC.NASA.GOV>
Sender: news@aol.net
> Kate supposedly takes such time and care with lyrice, so why does > she atypically bend grammar in such an inappropriate manner? > "Oh she move like a diva do..." Like there's not enough words that > rhyme with "you?" that she has to use an incorrect tense? But even more > embarassing for her, she apparently didn't bother to look up "diva." Using colloquial speech in a lyric, as opposed to correct grammar, is hardly a sin; it's a legit usage of one's artictic license. That doesn't mean that Kate's lyric there is brilliant, or that this particular usage is appropriate (although I think it works fine), but it's certainly not definitively sloppy. Look at it this way: Bob Dylan's "It ain't me, babe; it ain't me you been lookin' for" would not have worked as "It is not me, child; it is not me for whom you have been looking." Catch my drift? Diva's do not dance, this is true, but they carry themselves with a certain type of overarching dignity and poise, so perhaps Kate wished to capture this. Also, diva is derived from the Latin for goddess, and so it may have been a deliberate alternate usage. Given that Ms. Bush has been called a Pop diva for over 15 years, I doubt she's unfamiliar with the word's true definition. Peter Stoller