Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-07 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Jon Drukman <jdrukman@us.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 94 12:06:42 PST
Subject: beauty, meaning, and other things out of fashion...
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Reply-To: jdrukman%dlsun87@us.oracle.com
Wade writes: >led to a shift from the skill of performing music to that of >"composing" an album, a trend that I just don't care for. (Of course >that doesn't mean it's bad, just means I don't like it.) well, as you say it's YOUR problem, then i can't really debate it. i will just say that as someone who has done his fair share of composition and performance, i don't think it's a bad thing and i do like it. >(My all time favorite artist is Bob Dylan, and let's face it if >there was not a Bob Dylan doing psychadelic lyrics we probably wouldn't >have had to deal with "Donovan" so even Bob had something of a negative >influence on pop music! :-) ooh, i hate Dylan. has there ever been a Dylan original that was better than the cover? i don't think so. he was a much better composer than performer, if you see what i mean. >But there are examples of new instruments that were used to good effect >and for good reason, and some examples of the oppisite. Good example: >the invention of the electric guitar used in it's early years so that >blues musicians could be heard over the racket in a bar. Turned out >to work well and lead to many musical inovations. Bad example: >Switched on Bach, and drum machines. Yuck. 'Nuff said. i think the guitar is just as abused and misused as synths & drum boxes are. right now i am listening to an album that manages to integrate synths, drum boxes, guitars and actual singing in a really wonderful and innovative way. i don't expect to find more like it any time soon, however. these guys (Underworld) are as unique as Kate in that they make music unlike anyone else. >I have no problem with "art" or "rock". My problem is with "art-rock." have you listened to Ozric Tentacles? their musical is meticulously crafted but with room for the human element. as a composer, i am aware of the value of spontaneity, which is why i usually leave a little room in my tracks for some jamming and improv. the Ozrics have me beat hands down, though, when it comes to musicianship - they are incredibly talented and versatile and technical. check 'em out. particularly "Jurassic Shift". >The original point I was making was that I think that the advent of using >multiple tracks and "splicing together" different performances was leading >to a situation in which the art of performing is being lost in popular >music to the point that many artist have to resort to "lip-syncing" >(spelling??) because they simply can't perform. i think you are being gratuitously unfair in lumping together all types of "layered" music. multitracking can be used to make a madonna record or a kate record or something far stranger. this prejudice against composed works in favor of spontaneous jamming and the exaltation of "live musicians working in a live setting" just grates on me. where would jamaican dub reggae be without the advent of the modern recording studio? Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.