Re: Bjork :-(

[Alex Gibbs <arg@kilimanjaro.opt-sci.Arizona.EDU>]

100276.2176@CompuServe.COM (Marcel Rijs) writes:
> Indeed we do. Or at least, I do, after reading half a digest of
> Sarah Maglaglan, Sandy Denny and this message to top it off.
...
> I hope this ends the talk about this tart on this list as of now.
> Move it to the list that mudheap belongs to, thankyewverymuch.

Remember r.m.g/love-hounds was not created just for discussing Kate,
as the FAQ says.  However, it is true there is a Sugarcubes/Bjork
mailing list.  Wether that should exclude an artist from being
mentioned here is arguable.  Certainly it's *not* currently
preventable, especially when new people may not know about other
lists/news groups.
---
AlexGibbs arg@kilimanjaro.opt-sci.arizona.edu |\| | (~, |-| ~|~ |-| /-\ \/\/ |<
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
 foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." <Douglas Adams
"Without the pain there'd be no learning.              \ / Constellation of the
 Without the hurting we'd never change."               / \  Heart  <Kate Bush>
"Have you ever seen a picture of Jesus laughing? Mmm, do   \   Why Should I
 you think He had a beautiful smile?  A smile that healed."  \  Love You?