Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-06 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Chris Conlon <conlonc@mail.tva.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 12:10:32 EST
Subject: Miranda Sex Garden, _Iris_ et. al. (~80 lines)
To: Love-Hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Thanks to everyone with Miranda Sex Garden info, I got my questions answered. (Although I found some new ones to ask.) Some responses: Graham Dombkins writes: > Yep, I'm another Miranda Sex Garden fan. I only new them from the few >video's I ever got to see of them on light night Rage (a music video program Your TV will actually *play* good stuff like MSG? Wow... eMpTyV totally let me down on this score, even 120 Minutes. (what *was* I thinking?) >here in Oz). I've always loved _Gush_Forth_my_Tears_, now you say there's a CD >single that I missed! Please give me info on it so I can try and chase it up. Well, I have the US version CD single here. I don't know which #'s matter, so I'll go overboard. On the disc it says (p) 1991 Mute Records Ltd., 66497-2. It also says "Made in USA by WEA manufacturing" and "A Time Warner company...". Maybe WEA does US distribution of Mute material, like 4AD and reprise. On the case the disc # is 9 66497-2, I guess they had a buncha spare 9's that day. By way of comparison, the liner notes say that _Madra_ is # 61126. Good luck. >As for what CD's I do have. Well I seached for ages and found -nothing- until >Iris turned up. That was my sole MSG (sounds like a food additive ;-) CD I >owned for months (nice CD too, get it if you can). Then about Novemeber last >year my sister found Madra (?? I think that's its name I can't really remember >it at the moment) and bought it for me !! :-) It was lovely BUT be warned the >differences between these two CD's are GREAT. Madra is solely beautiful >harmonies in a kind of a-cappella style while Iris has those voices hidden in >back of some, at times, loud musical accompaniment. Many thanks to Graham and Shaun (comments below) for the mini-reviews and the warnings; I do like _Madra_, but I was kind of hoping they'd add some instruments (only a few) in there. Maybe they added too many, but I have enough info to risk the $$$ now. shaun@iris.mincom.oz.au (Man in Polyester Suit) wrote: >I found the Iris EP very disappointing. The inclusion of a couple of >instruments made it sound more like a second rate Steeleye Span than >anything in the IMHO more interesting Dead Can Dance vein that they had >hitherto been exploring. >But we are all subject to mood swings. Some further excitement: vickie@pilot.njin.net (Vickie Mapes) writes: >I like the dance remix of Gush better than the album version, but then, >I can only take acapella madrigals in very small doses (note: that does I feel likewise about madrigals. I like 'em, but too much is too much. Which makes me wonder a bit. With other music I like, 2-4 nonstop hours is no problem. Why is it that only madrigals get tiresome? Any clues? >not mean I don't like Madra, it's just that I'm rarely in the mood to >listen to it for pleasure.) I have Iris, but I just haven't had a chance >to listen to it properly yet. >The video to Gush Forth my Tears is *lovely*. It's the dance remix Actually, the way I got intro'ed to MSG was 15 seconds of the video (that's all they played) on 120 Minutes. My ears said: (1) Get your wallet. (2) Go to Tower Records *right now*. (3) Purchase. I complied, and lived happily ever after. And now I wonder, is the video available anywhere? >too, which is nice. I'm looking forward to the next album, which is >supposed to be more like the remix than Madra. Is there another album on the way? (After _Iris_?) Would be nice... Anyway, thanks to all for the overwhelming && informative responses. Chris Conlon