Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-14 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Scott Telford <s.telford@ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1992 03:27:31 -0700
Subject: Re: Backmasking in Leave it Open
To: w@dcs.ed.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.
References: <65318@apple.Apple.COM> <65601@apple.Apple.COM> <65604@apple.Apple.COM> <65626@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: nnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk
In article <65626@apple.Apple.COM> cutter@silver.lcs.mit.edu (Faux Joe) writes: > >The Kick Inside was top-40 back then, fella. Since then, her >popularity has been steadily on the wane, no matter how much we raving Not true. Maybe it waned when The Dreaming came out, but it didn't half wax again when she released HoL. However, I doubt she'll ever have another #1, not that that's of any significance at all... >all. To say that she's "very popular" is silly; if you consider being >the object of ridicule and derision in the press as well as popular Everybody famous gets ridiculed and derided in our press sooner or later. KaTe's come off better than most, probably due the gutter press not being able to find many juicy secrets (and having more newsworthy people to invent secrets about too 8^) >belief that she's totally 'round the bend as "very popular" ,then OK; A bit of an exageration: there's a lot of stars who are widely perceived as being a heck of a lot more "round-the-bend" than KaTe ever was. Take Wacko Jacko f'rinstance. (He's still being portrayed on "Spitting Image" with oxygen mask in hand!) >she's very popular. However, there are many MANY artists who chart >more consistently and more frequently that Kate. I would say practically everybody who takes any interest at all in rock/pop and who's been around in the UK for the last 7-14 years has heard of KaTe, knows what she looks like, and can hum at least one of her songs. Ok, they may only remember Wuthering Heights or Wow, and the leotards and waving arms, but they still remember her. Charting singles are becoming increasing irrelevant now that the UK singles chart is full of the kind of "dance" crud that takes 5 minutes to throw together on a Wavestation or whatever. (oh for the early eighties again 8^) -- Scott Telford, Dept of Computer Science, electric mail: s.telford@ed.ac.uk University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Rd, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK. ------ <wham!> "It's in the trees!" <wham!><wham!><wham!> "It's coming!" ------