Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-07 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Andy Gough, x4-2906, pager 420-2284, CH2-59" <@hermes.intel.com:AGOUGH@AZ.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1992 14:46:00 -0800
Subject: Names: double and single
To: Love-Hounds@eddie.mit.EDU
>From: stev0@sti.com (Steve Berlin) >Subject: Names without frontiers > >Y'know, everyone around here (including yours truly) refers to Kate >as, well, Kate. Now, I can sorta see why folks don't refer to her >as Bush - a casual listener might think we were refering to some >Bozo who - oh, let's just call him that President thing. > >But when you think about it, when we refer to female artists in >general, what do we call them? Kate, Laurie, Yoko, etc. First names. >When we refer to male artists? Gabriel, Clapton, Gilmour, etc. >Last names. We refer to children and those of lesser stature by >first names, adults and those of higher social stature by last name >(usually preceeded by "Mr.", "Dr.", or even "Ms." (although the >Powers That Be frown on this last one)). > >The reason for name usage is obvious - If I just said "David", you would >ask "WHICH David?" (Gilmour? Bowie? Allen?). But refering to >"Lydia", in the context of talking about alternative music and such, >pretty much boils it down to Lydia Lunch. > >Even so, (to me anyway) this seems rather - (oh, go ahead and say it!) - >sexist. But maybe we don't need more Lydias - maybe we just need less >Davids. Or even better - less Davids and more Lydias! Yeah, that's it! >- Stev0, who will kill you if you call him "Sensitive" Well, I can think of one male rock star that is often referred to by his first name only: Jimi. -andy