Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-46 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic <jondr@sco.COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1991 10:54:25 -0800
Subject: Re: MisK.
To: rec-music-gaffa@sco.COM
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Santa Cruz Origami, Inc.
References: <9112032108.AA03656@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic <fscott!jondr@uunet.uu.net>
Sender: news@sco.COM
I am not IED0DXM@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU. I didn't say: > IED noticed that Drukman listened to "Rocket Man" (though--alas, >unsurprisingly--with insufficient care) at |>oug /\lan's invitation. It wasn't *quite* like that. Our entourage (including Blast From The Past Love-Hound Par Excellence Joe Turner) arrived at |>oug's apartment, whereupon I immediately *requested* that he play it for me. A number of the entourage (including Joe) were crestfallen - "you're not going to like it." "Oh, I'm so SICK of that song..." But a combination of |>oug's mighty stare and my persistent whine prevailed and we were treated to the track. >Since |>oug has expressed a very positive opinion of the single (at >least of the a-side), IED wonders whether there was any substantive >argument between Drukman and |>oug about the recording's merits. Here's what the conversation went like, more or less: J: "That's IT?" D: "Whaddya mean THAT'S IT?" J: "It sounds like someone pushed the `reggae' button on their casio home synth toy!" D: "It's GREAT!" J: "No it isn't!" D: "Yes it is!" J: "Why is it great?" D: "Why ISN'T it great?" (Those who have spent time with |>oug know that this is Classic Doug Alan Argument Technique. I usually get suckered by it.) J: "Well, it's so... I dunno... unremarkable." D: "What did you expect?" J: "From KATE? I expected something unbelievably mind-blowingly orgasmic! This is just... well... bland!" D: "Oh, you just didn't listen to it properly." J: "What do you mean?" D: "If you listened to it properly, you'd know how great it is." (At this point, Bob and Joe chimed in with "oh come on, it's really ordinary, admit it you silly doug person" remarks, but Doug was quite adamant. He said something like, "You people are pathetic - you've lost the ability to appreciate Kate." We retorted, "if she'd do something worth appreciating, we'd be first in line to appreciate it.") I have to admit that, excellent though Doug's sound system is, I was being distracted by people waving CDs in my face, not to mention the emotional rush of hanging out with the Mutant Music Lover crew again, preparing for the cut and thrust of stimulating intellectual discussion of New Music ("This thing SUCKS." "No it DOESN'T." "Yes it DOES." "You're a TWERP.") In all fairness, I *do* need to listen to the track a few more times before arriving at a concrete decision about it, and I fully intend to pick up the RM/CitW single within the next few days, but that was my initial impression: distinctly underwhelming. -- Jon Drukman (finely honed machine) uunet!sco!jondr jondr@sco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- With hungered flesh obscurely, he mutely craved to adore.