Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-44 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1991 09:09:53 -0800
Subject: Re: The REAL meaning of SiG (take 2)
To: rec-music-gaffa@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
References: <9111210459.AA09254@bunny.gte.com>
Reply-To: tjc50@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
In article <9111210459.AA09254@bunny.gte.com> gb10@gte.COM (Gregory Bossert) writes: > >you got it 'right' both times. i *know* what the song means, to me, >and it's very important and only a bit like both your ideas... Right! Who says that the originator of an expression should have a monopoly on the meaning of his or her expression? No communication is communicated until the communication is perceived, and perception is as important to the conveyance of meaning as creation. -- The above is my thoughts, not my employer's; Terry Carroll 408/992-2152 The above is not legal advice; tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com All models over 18 years of age. tjc50@amail.amdahl.com