Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1991-44 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Re: The REAL meaning of SiG (take 2)

From: tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1991 09:09:53 -0800
Subject: Re: The REAL meaning of SiG (take 2)
To: rec-music-gaffa@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
References: <9111210459.AA09254@bunny.gte.com>
Reply-To: tjc50@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)


In article <9111210459.AA09254@bunny.gte.com> gb10@gte.COM (Gregory Bossert) writes:
>
>you got it 'right' both times.  i *know* what the song means, to me, 
>and it's very important and only a bit like both your ideas...

Right!  Who says that the originator of an expression should have a monopoly
on the meaning of his or her expression?  No communication is communicated
until the communication is perceived, and perception is as important to the
conveyance of meaning as creation.
-- 
The above is my thoughts, not my employer's; Terry Carroll  408/992-2152
The above is not legal advice;               tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com
All models over 18 years of age.             tjc50@amail.amdahl.com