Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-44 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: root@crash.cts.com
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1991 14:16:16 -0800
To: nosc!rec-music-gaffa@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Path: pnet01!rhill From: rhill@pnet01.cts.com (Ronald Hill) Subject: Re: KaTe vs. Mary again Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1991 06:16:06 GMT Message-ID: <1991Nov19.061606.5419@crash.cts.com> Sender: news@crash.cts.com judi@coyote.datalog.COM (Judi McKernan) writes: > > Sat last night and watched "Back to the Future III" again, which has >Mary Steenburgen in it. Okay, I'll concede, that in certain lighting and >certain poses, she does look just a little bit like Our Goddess KaTe... > > > judi It's not that she always looks so much like Kate, though if you look in the movie Parenthood it is more obvious, it's also that she ACTS like Kate. I saw Siskel And Ebert when they had the greatest "unknown" actors and actresses a year of so ago and they were talking about how she just radiates a kind of goodness and light and they couldn't think of any other actress who did that nowadays. I was shouting KATE, KATE! but of course she doesn't act all that much! :-) Ron "IF it's got Mary Steenburgergen in the movie, it's got me in the audience" Hill UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!rhill ARPA: crash!pnet01!rhill@nosc.mil INET: rhill@pnet01.cts.com