Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-44 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: root@crash.cts.com
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1991 14:16:16 -0800
To: nosc!rec-music-gaffa@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Path: pnet01!rhill
From: rhill@pnet01.cts.com (Ronald Hill)
Subject: Re: KaTe vs. Mary again
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1991 06:16:06 GMT
Message-ID: <1991Nov19.061606.5419@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@crash.cts.com
judi@coyote.datalog.COM (Judi McKernan) writes:
>
> Sat last night and watched "Back to the Future III" again, which has
>Mary Steenburgen in it. Okay, I'll concede, that in certain lighting and
>certain poses, she does look just a little bit like Our Goddess KaTe...
>
>
> judi
It's not that she always looks so much like Kate, though if you look
in the movie Parenthood it is more obvious, it's also that she ACTS like Kate.
I saw Siskel And Ebert when they had the greatest "unknown" actors and
actresses a year of so ago and they were talking about how she just radiates a
kind of goodness and light and they couldn't think of any other actress who
did that nowadays. I was shouting KATE, KATE! but of course she doesn't act
all that much! :-)
Ron "IF it's got Mary Steenburgergen in the movie, it's got me in the
audience" Hill
UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!rhill
ARPA: crash!pnet01!rhill@nosc.mil
INET: rhill@pnet01.cts.com