Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-44 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1991 14:09:34 -0800
Subject: Fitted (Was: Ba-Bush-Ka)
To: rec-music-gaffa@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
References: <91Nov14.091304pst.437199@wiretap.Spies.COM> <1991Nov18.025349.24005@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
Reply-To: tjc50@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
In article <1991Nov18.025349.24005@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> ryan@ces.cwru.EDU (Ryan McGuire) writes: >In article <91Nov14.091304pst.437199@wiretap.Spies.COM> MTARR@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU writes: >> >>Actually, the funniest thing I've ever heard her say was last year (goddess, >>that was almost exactly a year ago!) at the KonvenTion, when she was talking >>about the song "The Sensual World" and the hell she went through with the Joyce >>estate while writing it. She said something like "Here I was with this music >>and this passage, and the words just *fitted*, you know, they fitted so >>well..." >> >>Fitted. Yeah. Is that like in the King James Bible where everything gets >>builded and begetted and all that? ;) > > Actually my American Heritage Dictionary lists both fitted and fit as >the past tense of fit. Note that "fitted" even came first. In most dictionaries (contrary to what a lot of people, including myself up to a couple of weeks ago, expect), the first usage listed is _not_ the "more correct", but rather, the oldest usage. That is, "fitted" being prior to "fit" may only indicate that "fitted" is older than "fit", which I guess would support that "King James" theory :-) ObKate: IMHO, "Ken" is a boogier song than even "The Big Sky". -- The above is my thoughts, not my employer's; Terry Carroll 408/992-2152 The above is not legal advice; tjc50@amail.amdahl.com (preferred) All models over 18 years of age. tjc50@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com