Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-37 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1991 04:53:40 -0700
Subject: Re: instruments
To: love-hounds@wiretap.spies.com
References: <7B6EC7AB6000009B@sc.intel.com> <9110152128.AA08472@lewhoosh.umd.edu>
Sender: kjetilho@ifi.uio.no
Andy writes: > One flutist went farther, though. The flutist played the music, then went > back and edited out all of the breaths between notes--forming one > "superbreath" for the duration of the music. Now, this is a real instrument, > but an unreal performance. Which is better? Flute playing with breaths, or > flute playing without taking a breath? Jeff writes: > Anybody who's a fan of the Ian Anderson school of flautism (and I know > there are a number of Tull fans around .gaffa) should have a rather easy > answer to this one.... ;-) The breathing noise itself can be an important part of the sound, to be sure! The group Altiplano I mentioned earlier, has another approach. They play among other things these *large* bass flutes (oh the curses of being a non-native speaker), and it is simply impossible (or so they tell me) to play anything resembling fast phrases with these. So two of them play every other note... I wouldn't have noticed the interleaving if I hadn't seen them in concert. Great stuff! Kjetil T. "With you in my heart - the rhythm divine" PS. Was anyone else disgusted with the stickers on the new Guns and Roses albums? "If you're offended by the language, f*ck off and go to the new age section", or something like that. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but I almost felt unwelcome as a Guns'n'Roses fan since I listen to a lot of newage as well.